Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court denied Allstate Insurance Company’s last chance to override a Texas law that prohibits insurance companies from owning collision repair shops. Docket for 07-775
Allstate, and its wholly-owned subsidiary Sterling Collision Centers, Inc. (OK, I’m being lazy — Sterling is actually a wholly-owned subsidiary of Allstate Non-Insurance Holdings, Inc. — which is an indirect affiliate of Allstate) have been fighting with Texas since 2003 over the enactment of Tex. Occ. Code § 2307.002 that states “an insurer may not own or acquire an interest in a repair facility.” The Texas Legislature enacted the statute because of grave concerns involved with the inherent conflict of interest present when an insurer collects premiums and provides the collision service to the policyholders as well.
Allstate and Sterling have been fighting tooth and nail to have the Texas statute declared unconstitutional — without riveting success — and despite having pulled out Allstate’s moldy wallet to spring for the likes of Kirkland & Ellis (the Washington, D.C. office, no less) and Mr. Pricey himself, Ken Starr. Yes, Ken Starr of Monica Lew… well, probably the less said, the better.
The district court decision found that Allstate actively referred unsuspecting claimants to its Sterling shops — even when those shops were providing poor service and some were given failing marks by Allstate’s own surveys. Yet, Allstate had a financial interest in making Sterling profitable, so claims representatives continued to shove insureds and third parties to the Sterling shops, many of whom naively patronized the collision repair facilities on Allstate’s recommendation. As a result, the court had no trouble appreciating the Texas Legislature’s concerns and desire to protect consumers.
Allstate claimed that the statute violated the Dormant Commerce Clause of The U.S. Constitution. I know, I know, lawyers everywhere are now dusting off their Con. Law textbooks — except for the 11 of you legal geeks who actually dwell on the DCC and use it daily (I’ll bet you have pocket protectors). Allstate/Sterling’s argument was that the Texas statute had a negative impact on interstate commerce because it discriminated against large insurers and chains of collision repair facilities in favor of local ones, and was passed to accomplish that discriminatory goal.
Needless to say, there are many sexier issues being presented to the Justices than the DCC, so it was always likely that our highest court would pass on this one. But, you just never know with the Big Black Robes. The bottom line, however, is that the U.S. Supreme Court “just said, NO” to Allstate and Sterling. Now Texas can go back to doing what it does best: producing oil so, hopefully, our gas prices will go down.
The Automotive Service Association (ASA) deserves a big round of applause for all of its efforts in supporting the Texas Attorney General and by its action intervening in the case on his side from the beginning. Most people probably don’t know that the Texas A.G.’s office didn’t even file a Brief in response opposing the the Petition for Certiorari. (I don’t mean that critically, just stating facts.) Fortunately, ASA did — and the organization deserves considerable credit for its efforts and all the money spent to help support a law keeping insurers out of the repair business and keeping collision repair businesses focused on serving the interests of its true customer, the consumer.
Technorati Tags: insurance, collision repair, Allstate, Texas, law, Supreme Court
